The Lynching of JNU

Jawaharlal Nehru University, or JNU as it is known in Delhi and beyond, has once again been in the news for the last three weeks.  Its students have been protesting not only against large hikes in hostel fees, but against other features of the draft hostel manual which imposes a dress code and sets a curfew for students.  The university and nearby residential colonies have been swarming with police, but the students have been successful in taking their demonstrations to many parts of central Delhi and the area around Parliament.  There are reliable reports, and video footage, of students, including some who are disabled, who have been beaten by the police.  Students have been lathi charged, and many have been detained.  The Delhi Police has, predictably, denied all charges of police brutality, and rests its case upon the fact that the imposition of Section 144 of the Indian Penal Code, which outlaws public assemblies of more than five people, means that the protestors are in violation of the law.


JNU has long been one of the country’s most distinguished universities.  That, some might argue, says little considering that no Indian university, going by the Times’ Higher Education World University Rankings (2020), ranks within the world’s top 300 institutions of higher education, and JNU falls within the 601-800 rankings.  Even within Asia alone, JNU is ranked a measly 95th.  Nevertheless, the university has exercised an outsized influence in Indian public and intellectual life, and some of its graduates have gone on to gain global renown.  JNU justly celebrated the award of the 2019 Nobel Prize in Economics to one of its graduates, Abhijit Banerjee, and a number of its graduates now occupy very high positions in the present government and the civil services.

Such rankings should, in any case, be treated be severe skepticism if not dismissed outright.  JNU has much else to its credit, all of which has made it the target of the present government and the university administration headed by a Vice Chancellor who has shown himself utterly incapable of exercising independent judgment.  More than any other university in the country, JNU remains a site of dissent.  Whatever distinctions its graduates and faculty have earned in the academic sphere, in scientific research, or in public life, many of them have shown that in a modern civilized society it is imperative that the university be safeguarded as one of the last bastions of free speech and dissent.  Four years ago, the government attempted to silence some PhD students—among them, Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid, and Anirban Bhattacharya—by charging them with sedition and criminal conspiracy, for no better reason than they had held a demonstration against the sentence of capital punishment that had been handed out to Afzal Guru, convicted of an attack on the Indian Parliament.


Kanhaiya Kumar, JNU Student Union leader. Source: Hindustan Times, 7 March 2016.

The culture of dissent, and independent thinking, cannot however by gauged only by an occasional show of protest, and what makes JNU stand out is the spirit of inquiry which informs intellectual and cultural life on campus.  This was demonstrated, in the aftermath of the government’s heavy-handed and much critiqued handling of the sedition case, by an extraordinary series of lectures on nationalism that were held outside the administration building.  The BJP government has sought, since it came to power in 2014, to capture nearly every state institution, and its inability to silence students at JNU has doubled its resolve to bring the university to heel.  JNU’s students are similarly emboldened to stand their ground, indeed for reasons that the government fears and cannot dare to acknowledge.  JNU is unique in that it draws half of its student body from families that live at the edge of poverty, living on Rs 12,000 or less a month. There are students whose fathers work as hawkers and landless laborers, and in hazardous industries as daily wage laborers.  The supposition of the government, of course, is that such students have no reason to study; they certainly have no right to dream of a better livelihood than their parents.


If all of this were not enough to bring distinction to JNU, there is yet something more that makes the university absolutely singular in India. It is doubtless the first university to be publicly lynched.  The country has been witness for the last several years to many lynchings of Muslims and Dalits. Make hay while the sun shines, so goes the proverb, and some Hindu nationalists have been on the rampage knowing fully well that that they can commit, with full impunity, heinous crimes.  The idea of an institution being “lynched” may strike some as bizarre, but I doubt very much that the public lynching of JNU has any parallels in modern Indian history.  It may well be JNU’s misfortune that, being named after Jawaharlal Nehru, and having, on top of that, something of a reputation (deservedly or otherwise) as a left-wing institution, it was bound to exercise the attention of the present government, which absolutely loathes the name of Nehru and has lost no opportunity to ridicule the achievements and legacy of India’s first and longest serving Prime Minister.  Most recently, BJP Vice President Shivraj Singh Chouhan has charged Nehru with the “crime” of introducing Article 370 and “announcing ceasefire in war with Pakistan”, a view at once endorsed by Bhopal BJP MP Pragya Thakur who agrees that Nehru, having hurt “our motherland”, was “surely” a “criminal”. Thakur, we should remember, spent nearly a decade in jail on charges of being a terrorist and is technically still out on bail. One might speak of the pot calling the kettle black, but such proverbs would be lost on the illiterates who now command India’s destiny.

The government, having done whatever it deemed necessary to tame JNU, has now left the shaming and lynching of the university to the country’s middle class.  We all know of the television anchor whose trademark harangue, which would be comical if it were not so incendiary, begins with this line:  “The country wants to know . . .”  JNU students are now routinely accused of being anti-national, an allegation which makes a traitor of anyone who does not subscribe to the idea of Hindu supremacy.  But the demonization of JNU students has many other, equally disturbing, features.  A BJP MLA from Rajasthan’s Alwar District had claimed, following the arrest of Kanhaiya Kumar, that “3,000 used condoms, 500 used abortion injections, 10,000 cigarette pieces, among other things,” are found at JNU “daily”, and that “girls and boys dance naked in cultural programmes” at the university.


Cartoon by R. Prasad, Mail Today.

What he claimed then is now claimed by thousands of middle class Indians posturing as guardians of public morals who are convinced that JNU is a den of vice:  here girls dance naked and they are shameless in flaunting their bodies, both girls and boys are hooked on drugs, and university hostels are little better than places where sex can be had for the cheap.  JNU students, it is being said, are generally engaged in worthless research and are, in any case, much too old to be students.  Social media is awash with such stories.  One story doing the rounds on Facebook, shared 1,400 times within hours of it being posted, represented a 43-year old woman as a student whose daughter was also a student at JNU!  The story circulated with the hashtag, #ShutDownJNU.  The 43-year old woman was a figment of the imagination.

Screen Shot 2019-11-21 at 9.51.09 PM

An illustration of the stories circulating about JNU in social media: this one has the endorsement of IIT Madras Junta Against Leftist APSC [Ambedkar-Periyar Study Circle] and bears the hashtag #ShutDownJNU. Source:

Those agitating for the closure of JNU, or stern disciplinary action against students, are pathetic for yet other reasons.  Some of them have taken recourse to the argument, drawn entirely from the playbook of American populism, that JNU is a drain on public resources and that “tax-payers” should not have to subsidize lazy, old, and left-inclined students so that they can write on worthless topics which do nothing for the country’s economy.  The sheer poverty of such thinking is what should alarm the country.  This is apart from the fact that India’s middle class is notorious for tax evasion, and it can be safely said that many objecting to the waste of tax-payers’ money are evading the payment of their own taxes.  India has a seriously ailing economy.  As the loud shouting against JNU shows, what ails the imagination in India is equally frightening.



10 thoughts on “The Lynching of JNU

  1. Professor Lal,

    I urge you to please look at some of the graffiti JNU students have been drawing on the walls of their supposedly beloved campus:

    Is it not unbecoming of university students to be posting such inflammatory graffiti? This is spreading, too, even to Banaras Hindu University where I am. People posting signs saying “नरेंद्र मोदी शिक्षा विरोधी हैं”. This about a man who went from being a humble chai wallah to the Prime Minister! He of all people knows of the plight of lower income students but asks the logical question: “Ghar mein nahin daana
    Phir bitwa ko African tribes kyun padhana?”

    If poverty is issue, why not study to become employable?


    • I looked at the graffiti posted on the walls.
      What is really so inflammatory about it? The evidence that the present government is doing everything it can to destroy public universities is there for everyone to see. I could have in fact made an even stronger argument: for instance, the draft hostel rules treat students as though they were children. There is absolutely no understanding of what constitutes a “university”, and “university culture”. One does not study only to become employable; in fact, real learning should be divorced from the question of getting a job. I’m only giving you nuggets here but there are previous blog essays that speak to these subjects.


      • I agree that education should not be connected to employability and it’s tragic that this is how it’s viewed these days. Even if someone felt that this was the ultimate goal, however, doesn’t the argument against increased tuition still stand? If it really is just about job training then the future employer should fund it, like an apprenticeship program. And if it really is about the public good then the state should fund it. Either way, the increased tuition should be opposed.


      • Isn’t “Time for Revolution” a call to violence? Is it also not expected that university culture is different in India than the West? If not about getting employable graduates then why taxpayers should fund universities so lavishly instead of students bearing the cost for educational endeavors?


  2. JNU is a place without need. It was created by act of parliament for a bizarre reason. There are many excellent universities all throughout India but somehow JNU is the only one that is so full of anti-nationals. India is the only country that tolerates this. Imagine if an American university was full of such anti-American people: the Americans would shut down the university immediately.


    • Same old standard unthinking response. You’re merely repeating the canard that students at JNU are anti-national. I think you should join Arnab Goswami’s team. Think for yourself, and attempt to understand what constitutes dissent, and what the charge of anti-national means. I regret to say, moreover, that your note indicates that you have absolutely no knowledge of American universities. And why in any case is the American university your benchmark, unless of course to a colonized mind the US provides the benchmark for everything? It would be too much to expect you to understand what the aims of a university might be, whether in India, the US, France, Hong Kong, or elsewhere.


      • That reply from Devendra, still 2418 years after Western Democracy MURDERED Socrates (cf fates of Lao Zi, the Buddha, Zhuang Zi etc by contrast with MLK, John Lennon, and MY Medical MATES MURDERED in Mordor in 2017 alone) to SILENCE our LIFE LOVING TRUTH supporting Zio-fascist America’s CRIMES against LIFE since 1776, is a ringing endorsement of your thesis! WE Billions of anti-fascist (sic, lit) Homo sapienswith NO RIGHTS (refer UDHR 1948) especially to the protections of the LAW, DEFY such TRUTH HATING NIHILism


  3. I am very impressed by the students’ protests at JNU. If only American students could learn from this and protest the astronomical amounts of tuition we are required to pay. I was also heartened to see the recent response at Banaras Hindu University to the harassment of Prof. Feroze Khan on grounds that a Muslim should not be a professor of Sanskrit with vocal counter-protests defending him. While there are many long-standing issues with the model of university education we have, it is necessary at this point to take a defensive posture against the attacks being leveled against it by right wing governments around the world.


    • Please: you’re just repeating old canards. There have been leftists at JNU, for sure, but there are plenty of scholars who are far from being anything even remotely resembling “communists”. And the substantive nature of the argument needs to be addressed, instead of just mouthing the usual cliches.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s