The Feverish, Beautiful Madness of the World Cup

Saudi Arabia mid-fielder Saudi Arabia Salem Al-Dawsari (center) celebrating with a flip after scoring a spectacular goal that gave Saudi Arabia the lead and the win in the Group stage match against Argentina at Lusail.

The World Cup started in Qatar less than a week ago and, my oh my, it has set the world on fire. What else is there in life to compete with the feverish, beautiful, almost inexplicable madness of the World Cup?

There is, in reality, only one World Cup.  India and a few other countries that, with the exception of the late entrant to cricket, The Netherlands, inherited the game from England as former colonies recently competed in the ICC T20 World Cup. There is similarly the ICC One Day International version.  America has the gumption to call its baseball finals the “World Series” and similarly the National Basketball Association (NBA), which is confined to the United States (with a slight nod to Canada) and until a couple of decades ago barely even had any players from outside the US, describes the winners of the finals as “world champions”.  But the inescapable truth is that these are all comparatively parochial exercises in sports.  The only event that merits the designation of World Cup is the global battle for football supremacy.

In our day, as has been the case for some time, nationalism is inextricable from sports.  Thirty-two teams, having gone through the qualifying rounds, are competing this year in Qatar for the champion’s trophy, and in 2026 the number of countries that will field team increases to 48.  The fans come decked in their country’s colours.  The thrill that passes through their entire body when their country scores, sending them into convulsions, is akin to sheer bliss.  And, yet, it is the particular feature of what the Brazilians call “the beautiful game” that nationalism is just as often transcended as it is reinforced.  But let us not get ahead of ourselves.

To get a glimpse of what moves the world, what animates people, and the passion that impels men to invest their life savings and travel thousands of miles to follow their beloved team, one must turn to the World Cup.  It is a phenomenon quite unlike any other:  many suppose that the splendour of the Olympics is more than a match for the World Cup, but that is a wholly erroneous view.  There is something quite staid and officious about the Olympics; it projects power in a dull and orderly fashion.  To be sure, every now and then an Usain Bolt comes along and acts like a lightning rod, and likewise the female gymnasts and the divers with their synchronized moves before they plunge into the water impress and earn not only a name for themselves but cultural capital for the countries that they represent.  But the Dionysian – the ecstatic, sensuous, emotional, Bacchanalian – element that characterizes the World Cup is missing from the Olympics.  It is no surprise that China has over the last two decades made its way to the top besides the United States in the Olympics medals standings but is a non-entity in the World Cup.  The boring monstrosity that is the Chinese Communist Party would be lost at sea in the excess and ecstasy that is the World Cup.

This edition of the World Cup in Qatar has had its share of scandals, stories, and surprises—and the event is still in its early stages, with Brazil just having played its opening game.  There are rumours that the Qataris bribed their way into becoming the Chosen Ones.  For Europeans, from whom the rest of the world has learned a great many abominations such as racism, colonialism, and genocide, to pretend that that this alone is scandalous is something like the kettle calling the pot black.  Qatar is very hot in the summer, the usual time of the year when the World Cup is staged, and so it was moved to November-December, a comparatively “cooler” time of the year in a country where it remains at least warm throughout the year.  Perhaps the timing of the world’s most famous sporting event is inconvenient for Europeans, but it is time that Europe, which receives far more slots than any other continent, learned that it is no longer the center of the world.

There is much grumbling that Qatar is not permitting fans to wear armbands that display support for LGBTQ+ rights and European fans are scandalized that the sale of beer at World Cup stadiums has been prohibited.  But, if one had to speak of the scandalous, far more pertinent is the fact that several hundred migrant labourers, whose story I will convey in a separate piece, have died building World Cup stadiums in Qatar.  Their deaths will be put down to the usual weary disclaimer, “That is the way of the world.” Meanwhile, FIFA, the international football governing body that organizes the World Cup, has revenues of $5 billion and many of the players themselves earn tens of millions of dollars annually. 

Nevertheless, unless we think that the beautiful does not have a sordid side to it, this World Cup has already been a joyous explosion of talent, generating a feverish excitement and results that have stunned those who love this game that, at its best, is absolutely mesmerizing.  Spain demolished Costa Rica, 7-0, even if at times it appeared to be just playing a practice match.  Iran, which is being hammered by protests back home—another story which the world should watch with utmost attention—received a different kind of drubbing on the field as England made mincemeat of it, 6-2.  France had a spectacular beginning and, by a score of 4-1, made short work of Australia.  But this World Cup has been nothing if not a mélange of the predictable and the unpredictable, reason and superstition, the mundane and the extraordinary—and the unpredictable is always more promising. Who would have thought that Japan would send Germany, a powerhouse of football, into misery?  Two goals from two Japanese strikers were more than enough to neutralize and subdue the Germans who had one goal from a penalty. 

It is said that Japan’s victory had been foretold.  The day before the match, Taiyo, a river otter at an aquarium, had placed a miniature football in a blue bucket adorned with a Japanese flag, ignoring both the red bucket with a German flag and the yellow bucket that signified a drawn game.  In an earlier generation, the Europeans would have chuckled at this story and described it as a species of “Oriental superstition.”  But the world is now chuckling at the Germans.  The Japanese are calling upon the government to declare a national holiday—and thus emulate Saudi Arabia, which brings us to the most astonishing surprise unleashed thus far at this World Cup, or indeed in international sports.  No one expects anything much from the Saudis:  the oil-rich kingdom is, in the common imagination, good for nothing, its opulence having derived from neither from the labour nor the skill or intelligence of its own citizens. The country has made many strides in becoming green, while making the rest of the world dependent upon oil.  It is known the world over for many other unpleasantries, from unattractive potentates to forbidding women (until just some months ago) from driving cars.

Saudi Arabia has barely a presence on the international sport scene, except perhaps in falconry, and its football team is home-grown with little experience in international matches. Their opening match was with Argentina—a country that, much like Brazil, dreams football. Argentina came into the World Cup fresh from its victory over Brazil in COPA 2021, the championship that establishes football supremacy in South America.  Saudi Arabia’s leader, Mohammed bin Salman (known generally as MBS), had apparently instructed the players to go and enjoy themselves, and not think about winning.  The Saudi footballers more than enjoyed themselves; they disobeyed MBS and pulled off a stunning victory over Argentina, a win all the more spectacular as it came off an extraordinary goal—a demonstration of enormous skill, a flight of pure joy—by Al-Dawsari.  MBS declared the following day a national holiday in Saudi Arabia.

How far Saudi Arabia will go in this World Cup is anyone’s guess.  There was, a decade ago, the Arab Spring—a rather more momentous development in world politics. It did not last very long; some will say that it eventually led to chaos and lawlessness, even facilitating the rise of autocratic leaders such as Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, the President of Egypt who rules with an iron hand.  Saudi Arabia’s victory over Argentina is being described as a miracle, almost as an awakening of the Arab world.  It suggests that football, too, is being democratized:  the day when neither a South American nor European team wins the World Cup may not be very far off into the future.  The ascent of African, Asian, and Middle Eastern nations in the football world is a lovely thought. 

But this victory too can only be seen as bittersweet. MBS is, to use a colloquialism, a nasty piece of work, at least privately thought by the US and European countries to have ordered the gruesome killing of the dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul in 2018.  He has been looking for ways to rehabilitate himself and one can be certain that he, much as many other autocratic “leaders” have done, will use the victory of the Saudi national football team over Argentina to flaunt himself as a genuine leader, a visionary who is opening the country to the West and inspired the players to outdo themselves. The World Cup has never been only about football:  power, politics, and nationalism are intrinsic to the game.

Yet, there is, still, the artistry and elegance of that delivery into the net by Al-Dawsari that sent the world into a tizzy.  It is all this that makes for the beautiful, feverish madness of the World Cup.

First published in English at abplive.in under the same title on 25 November 2022.

Hindi translation published as विश्व कप की बेकरारी, बेताबी वाला खूबसूरत सा पागलपन फीफा on 25 November 2022.

Telugu translation published as ఫుట్‌బాల్ ప్రపంచ కప్! ఇది కేవలం ఆట కాదు అంతకుమించి! on 25 November 2020 at telugu.abplive.com

Bengali translation published as বিক্ষোভ, প্রতিবাদের মিছিলেও কাতার মেতেছে ফুটবল উৎসবে on 25 November 2020

21 thoughts on “The Feverish, Beautiful Madness of the World Cup

  1. The South Asian governments have allowed their own people to be treated as slaves in Qatar and other Gulf monarchies without lifting a finger.

    Like

  2. I wanted to comment on the presence of Saudi Arabia and many other gulf countries in the sports scene, specifically in football. While teams such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar have little experience in the world cup and international football in general, I believe that gulf countries are the most important for the future of club football in Europe. The trend in club football has recently been takeover of ownership by supergroup investment firms from gulf countries. This has led to great success for these teams at the disgust of rival fans. A recent example of this has been Newcastle United, a team in England’s Premier League. Newcastle United was sold for $305 million to the Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund, which in turn poured in money to the organization. Since then, Newcastle has jumped from 11th place in last year’s table to securing a Champions League spot for the first time in 20 years. This type of success is typical, as seen in teams such as Manchester City, owned by Sheikh Mansour of the United Arab Emirates, which has won the Premier League title 4 of the last 5 seasons. In my opinion, although the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council may not have a large place in international football, they certainly look to be at the center of European Club football for the foreseeable future.

    Like

  3. Professor Lal,
    I found your comments on the World Cup’s global impact particularly interesting. As a huge NBA basketball fan, it never occurred to me how ironic it was to call our champions “world champions”, especially since the NBA is composed of only teams in North America, as you have mentioned. It is indeed true that the World Cup features teams spanning from across the globe, but the dominance of European and South American Teams have been well-documented in the Cup’s history. Hence why any victories from “inferior” teams coming from Japan and Saudi Arabia have been met with incredible reactions from the world and great support to root for the underdogs. Had Spain won a match in the opening round and declared it a national holiday, the entirety of the world would be perplexed as this outcome is expected from a historically strong futbol program. Recently, Cristiano Ronaldo, an all-time great striker, signed with a Saudi based team for over 200 million dollars. If other superstars follow in his footsteps, I am curious to see if Saudi Arabia can build on their momentum from hosting the Cup and overtake some of the premier clubs in Europe. I liked how your post considered the dark side of the World Cup, specifically the many workers who passed away during the construction of stadiums. As grand and marvelous the event is, it is essential to always remember the amount of work and effort it takes to produce such a global spectacle. Even so, the World Cup’s ability to captivate millions of people is unparalleled, and it’s testament to fostering a global community through competition is unmatched.

    Like

  4. Professor Lal,
    I found your comments on the World Cup’s global impact particularly interesting. As a huge NBA basketball fan, it never occurred to me how ironic it was to call our champions “world champions”, especially since the NBA is composed of only teams in North America, as you have mentioned. It is indeed true that the World Cup features teams spanning from across the globe, but the dominance of European and South American Teams have been well-documented in the Cup’s history. Hence why any victories from “inferior” teams coming from Japan and Saudi Arabia have been met with incredible reactions from the world and great support to root for the underdogs. Had Spain won a match in the opening round and declared it a national holiday, the entirety of the world would be perplexed as this outcome is expected. Recently, Christiano Ronaldo, an all-time great striker, signed with a Saudi based team for over 200 million dollars. If other superstars follow in his footsteps, I am curious to see if Saudi Arabia can build on their momentum from hosting the Cup and overtake some of the premier clubs in Europe. I liked how your post considered the dark side of the World Cup, specifically the many workers who passed away during the construction of stadiums. As grand and marvelous the event is, it is essential to always remember the amount of work and effort it takes to produce such a global spectacle. Even so, the World Cup’s ability to captivate millions of people is unparalleled, and it’s testament to fostering a global community through competition is unmatched.

    Like

  5. It is mentioned by Professor Lal that the World Cup has never been about football, but about power, politics, and nationalism. I think this is true even on a smaller scale. For example, when I watch American sports leagues, such as the nfl or mlb, I feel the same way. I like both football and baseball and I genuinely enjoy the game, but I also feel the politics arise when I watch. As much as I wouldn’t like to admit, I do feel a slight smugness when teams from states with opposing beliefs lose, or when teams encounter controversy on a topic that I feel strongly about. It provides a sense of pride, which could be paralleled with that of nationalism, when my team is praised or my city is praised, and I am upset when a state or city that I feel is problematic or opposes my beliefs is praised. This is such an interesting idea, because at the end of the day, it really is just a sport, but its also so much more than that. It also makes me wonder how many other things have hidden political contexts, and how many of them I am also encouraging, whether consciously or not.

    Like

  6. Professor Lal points out an interesting idea that the World Cup often goes beyond nationalism. This idea deeply connects with me. I see it when people all over the world cheer and enjoy the abilities of players from different countries, often liking teams that aren’t from their own country. The excitement of the game can often blur the lines of nationality, and fans find themselves cheering for an amazing play or a surprising win, no matter where they come from.
    Moreover, the World Cup brings countries together that might not usually interact, helping to create a setting of shared respect and understanding. Even though the competition is tough, the main message is a shared love for the game of football – a common language that goes beyond cultural and national differences. This part of the World Cup, I believe, is a powerful symbol of how shared experiences can help us look beyond our differences and build a worldwide sense of community.

    Like

  7. The role of the Middle East in international football certainly seems to be expanding, whether in Saudi Arabia’s hosting of the World Cup or their defeat of Argentina, or, as another student commented, the huge investment in Premier League clubs in England. Despite Saudi Arabia’s national team defeating Argentina, club football in the Middle East is, at least compared to the top European clubs, at a much lower level. I find it interesting that instead of pouring money into clubs inside their country, Middle Eastern elites are investing in English clubs. Additionally, I find it disturbing that the new stadiums that brought in so much wealth and tourism for Saudi Arabia came at the cost of the lives of hundreds of people. Even further, the fact that FIFA decided (whether bribed or not) to hold the World Cup in Saudi Arabia, a country that is known to be guilty of various human rights violations (most seriously perhaps the use of flogging and amputation as punishment), demonstrates that whatever they may claim, FIFA places profit over human rights. Though football may not be commercialized to the same extent as American football or the NBA, publicity and profit influence the decisions of FIFA.

    Like

  8. The World Cup is such an exciting topic, and as technology becomes more advanced and more widely accessible, the viewership of the World Cup worldwide will increase. If we look at the World Cup today, compared to the match 50 years ago, there is no comparison. The World Cup started as a small match to invite national competitiveness between Europe, parts of Africa, and the Americas. Now it is a highly sought-over match between national soccer teams that brings millions of fans from all over the world– its popularity is so great that TV networks estimated to pay between $100-200 million for filming and television rights to the matches. While we can critique the World Cup, its political incompetence, and its dark history, we should focus more on the bigger issue: gender inequality in the sport. The Women’s World Cup sees much less viewership and receives much less attention. In fact, going back to what it costs to attain filming rights for the matches, it was estimated at the last Women’s World Cup that those filming rights were anywhere between $10-20 million. That’s nothing compared to what television networks pay to see the men’s World Cup match. If we want to focus on progressivism and point out the faults of autocratic leaders like Mohammad bin Salman of Saudi Arabia (a society that is highly sexist and anti-women), why not focus more on women? Emphasizing a game like the Women’s World Cup can change the political and societal status quo of women worldwide.

    Like

  9. This piece is one that I definitely where with wholeheartedly. As somebody who only watches it when my home country plays as a way of spending with my parents, I notice from an outside perspective how the World Cup transcends just “football.” Truthfully it is about the power play of politics, and the enormous amounts of nationalism that one feels for their country. Having lived in France for the last decade prior to UCLA, we all mumbled and grumbled at how the British left the Champs d’Elysees a pure mess after a match took place there, calling it an absolute abomination and disrespect for French infrastructure. Yet, Professor Lal brings up a phenomenal point about how Europeans like to point the blame – holding this double standard and turning a blind eye to the atrocities they caused. Furthermore, although wildly different, I am more invested in Eurovision which takes places every year. Similar to the World Cup, politics and nationalism takes hold over the entire competition, and as it is the people of Europe that do the voting, the populations’ views of different countries is seen directly on screen, with staggering patterns of voting taking place every year.

    Like

  10. Soccer is by far the sport that has the most passion and nationalism associated with it. The level of excitement and passion that people have for the sport, and their own country is unmatched to any of the large leagues. I think It was very interesting that Professor Lal brought attention to how we call the MLB championship the “world series” and the NBA champions, “the world champions”. I wonder if, for these sports, there was ever an attempt to expand the league to other countries. If, so that would make these titles more reasonable. One thing that was also touched on that I found quite interesting was the death of many migrant stadium workers. If conditions were so bad in Qatar, that over the years many workers passed away, I wonder why they didn’t bring more attention to this. Saying that it was “the way of the world”, is disappointing and overlooks an issue that should be investigated. If the weather conditions have the potential to put lives at risk, it should definitely be considered as a large factor. However, in this case, it is good that the world cup was shifted to a more cool season in Qatar.

    Like

  11. Hi Professor,

    As someone who cares nearly nothing for sports, I have to admit that all I know of the most recent World Cup is that it is embroiled in scandals. So many, in fact, that I struggle to understand how fans can remain so enthusiastic about cheering in stadiums that have been built on the bodies of their creators, built under working conditions that have been so publicly exposed and decried. Even John Oliver, the host of Last Week Tonight, who did a piece on this very scandal, concluded his segment by saying that his viewers should enjoy the games regardless and that he too will be rooting for England. I really expected him to call a boycott, or at least to advise for more direct action, but I suppose the World Cup is simply too big, too invested-in to oppose directly.

    It’s not that I don’t understand the fiery fervor born of competition, of picking your team and your champion and watching them triumph against all odds. I have cheered aloud in front of my computer for chess championships and TFT tournaments. But there has never been a competition I wouldn’t drop on a dime if it was revealed the hosts had murdered the programmers of their game, for example. Still, if you are correct about the World Cup’s inextricable ties to nationalism, then I suppose these deaths and Qatar’s open intolerance of LGBTQ+ expression are simply the price that people are willing to pay to see their country succeed on the world stage. Victory is more than extra points in a sports game. Victory is national pride, and people have fought bloody wars over that prize.

    Like

  12. I find the correlation between nationalism and sports to be interesting due to the behaviors people adopt when significant sports events, such as the World Cup, commence. Like Western European dominance in politics, the economy, and warfare, Europe also dominates the World Cup with most of the championships being won by European nations. An interesting observation in regard to European teams is that many allow African athletes to compete for their European team, as a result of receiving citizenship in the respective country. Teams such as France include many high-caliber athletes on their roster that are of African descent, for example, Kylian Mbappe. Fans are for the most part supportive of these players wearing the kits of the team they support, but there is a catch. Fans are always supportive in times of success, but completely turn on athletes when they fail. In 2022, France fell to the Argentinian team led by Leonel Messi in a thrilling match that went to penalties. Unfortunately, a few French players of African descent failed to score their penalty which led to a massive wave of racism towards Africans as a whole. Another example of racism arising as a result of sports was when England failed to win the Euro in 2020, which also went to penalties and ended similarly to the 2022 World Cup final. The strong sense of nationalism possessed by fans led to the creation of a scapegoat, the athletes of African descent competing for their European country. It is disgusting to see thousands of fans flood social media with racially discriminating comments as a result of a sports match, despite these African athletes deciding to represent their European country instead of their African country.

    Like

  13. I appreciate the perspective presented regarding the World Cup and the performance of the Saudi Arabia football team against Argentina. It was an exhilarating match to witness, one that I do not regret waking up early to watch! The unexpected victory of Saudi Arabia over Argentina, despite being the underdogs with odds of +2300 (implied probability of 4.17%), is a remarkable accomplishment that deserves celebration. Moreover, the declaration of a national holiday by the Saudi Arabian King in response to the team’s triumph should not be dismissed solely as a political ploy. While there may be political motivations involved, it may also reflect the genuine excitement and pride of the nation. The World Cup has the power to unite people and ignite fervor, and the King’s gesture can be seen as an acknowledgment of the team’s achievement and a shared celebration with the entire country. I believe it is crucial to avoid making negative generalizations when evaluating a country and its citizens. Terms such as “good for nothing” to describe Saudi Arabia and by extension its citizens is unfair and perpetuates stereotypes. Furthermore, overt generalizations sometimes lead to the presentation of inaccurate facts. For instance, women have been allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia since 2018, not “just a few months ago”, additionally, it was King Salman who declared the public holiday not Mohammed bin Salman.

    Like

  14. Professor Lal,
    I found your comment on the fervor and nationalism that surrounds the World Cup very interesting. Coming from a French-Ukrainian household, soccer (or as we call it football) has always been a big deal in my family, as it is the French national sport and my Ukrainian grandfather played professionally for Dynamo Kiev. However, it wasn’t until I moved out alone to America for college that I finally understood the fervor around the event; it was a way to connect with my country from afar. It is indeed interesting how, despite the number of International championships across various disciplines, it is commonly understood that one is referring to the football championship when they mention the World Cup. However, I somewhat disagree with your statement about the Olympics not being a match for the splendor of the World Cup. In my personal experience, the wide range of disciplines offered in the Olympics appeals to a greater audience. I have a lot of interest in ice skating, weightlifting, ski jumping or even fencing, but much less in football. The number of viewers of the event is also higher for the Olympics than the World Cup. The Olympics of 2016 in Rio drew an audience of 3.6 billion viewers; while the 2014 World Cup in Brazil saw a total audience of 1.1 billion. I also quite disagree with the statement about the CCP and China’s poor performance in the WC being intentional. China is a very competitive country that thrives to outperform the US and become a superpower. As pointed out in your essay, China performs incredibly well in the Olympics but only qualified for the WC once and lost in the group stage. Yet, they still try to qualify for the event every time. It would seem rational to me that if the CCP really feared the zeal of the event they would not be trying to qualify for it for the past 20 years. That said, it simply appears that China performs much worse when it comes to team sports. Out of the 89 medals it won during the 2020/2021 Olympics, only 5 were for a team sport.

    Like

  15. I appreciate the perspective presented regarding the World Cup and the performance of the Saudi Arabia football team against Argentina. It was an exhilarating match to witness, one that I do not regret waking up early to watch! The unexpected victory of Saudi Arabia over Argentina, despite being the underdogs with odds of +2300 (implied probability of 4.17%), is a remarkable accomplishment that deserves celebration. Moreover, the declaration of a national holiday by the Saudi Arabian King in response to the team’s triumph should not be dismissed solely as a political ploy. While there may be political motivations involved, it may also reflect the genuine excitement and pride of the nation. The World Cup has the power to unite people and ignite fervor, and the King’s gesture can be seen as an acknowledgment of the team’s achievement and a shared celebration with the entire country. I believe it is crucial to avoid making negative generalizations when evaluating a country and its citizens. Terms such as “good for nothing” to describe Saudi Arabia and by extension its citizens is unfair and perpetuates stereotypes. Furthermore, overt generalizations sometimes lead to the presentation of inaccurate facts. For instance, women have been allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia since 2018, not “just a few months ago”, additionally, it was King Salman who declared the public holiday not Mohhamad Bin Salman.

    Like

  16. I remember hearing about the controversy surrounding Budweiser during the World Cup and wondering why the media made it such a big deal. As a soccer fan myself I usually just watch the games without much consideration for the political background and motives that went into creating these tournaments. I also remember there was a lot of controversy surrounding the location of the World Cup being in Saudi Arabia and now understanding the political motivations and theories for how that could happen made me realize that I should pay more attention to the other stories surrounding sporting events. Oftentimes these stories are just as entertaining as the tournament itself and it could give me insight into just what it required to make these international tournaments happen.

    Like

  17. To begin with, I found your comment about no other sport being able to truly be a world sport like soccer and its World Cup to be genuinely fascinating. The reason is that I have had this same conversation with fellows acquaintances of mine in the past. I, myself, also do believe that soccer is the only sport that is genuinely on a world level. I think this is the only sport in which one can win a world championship. The international diversity within the sport is proof of why it should be considered a World Sport. Its reach is of a world level. If you were to go to certain places in the world and ask them which sport they knew best or anything of the sort, I am assured that Soccer will be a common sport because people all over the world speak about it and take the time to watch the sport. Moving forward, I believe that Japan’s and Saudi Arabia’s wins over former world cup winners are truly something magical. I feel like the event where Japan’s win is foretold is not anything big or foretold but I see it as something that can be seen as foretold because of the way Japan is seen as underdogs. I feel that this view of Japan being an underdog is why people will take things like a huge victory over Germany being foretold because of a little game where they had three buckets in front of an animal. But one thing that I found most interesting on this alone was if we predicted the win of a European the same way someone would not take this as something being foretold and would just take it as a fan wanting their team to win. The same goes for Saudi Arabia. If any European Country made a national holiday after taking a huge win, This would be seen as something wrong or maybe crazy. Since it is Saudi Arabia we are talking about they get the pass as an underdog. All in All, this essay and your view on the world cup is truly something very intriguing and I find it so fascinating how a sport or a World Championship of a sport can be so filled with different news and standings!

    Like

  18. One of the first things that came to mind when considering the World Cup in Qatar was the rampant reports of human rights violations, especially of those constructing the stadium, in the area. This, of course, is not limited to The World Cup, but also several other sports, from F1’s involvement in Saudi Arabia to decades ago, the 1936 Berlin Olympics, held in Nazi Germany. Unfortunately, this is often overlooked by sporting organizations in favor of making greater profits. Other than the aforementioned examples, athletics have long been used as a tool of political persuasion. Sports have long been used as a political tool in both the teams’ representative countries and the locations where the sports are held— to improve a country’s image and foster nationalism.
    This is especially prominent in soccer, or football, where people are fastidiously dedicated to their local or national teams, often to the point of riots if their team loses. What was originally a preference for an athletic team, because of the uproar and crowd mentality of sports, can lead in the best case, anger, but in the worst case, nationalism to the point of violence. However sports can also be used as a mechanism for mending national relationships, through sports diplomacy, which can also be seen through the lens of the World Cup, specifically the match between Iran and the United States at the 1998 World Cup symbolized a turn toward more positivity in the relationship between the two countries. Thus while sports, especially soccer, can represent heightened nationalism, it can also be a tool for diplomacy.

    Like

  19. Some of the biggest news that came about related to the World Cup in Qatar was the rampant reports of human rights violations, especially of those constructing the stadium, in the area. This, of course, is not limited to The World Cup, but also several other sports, from F1’s involvement in Saudi Arabia to decades ago, the 1936 Berlin Olympics, held in Nazi Germany. Unfortunately, this is often overlooked by sporting organizations in favor of making greater profits. Other than the aforementioned examples, athletics have long been used as a tool of political persuasion. Sports have long been used as a political tool in both the teams’ representative countries and the locations where the sports are held— to improve a country’s image and foster nationalism.
    This is especially prominent in soccer, or football, where people are fastidiously dedicated to their local or national teams, often to the point of riots if their team loses. What was originally a preference for an athletic team, because of the uproar and crowd mentality of sports, can lead in the best case, anger, but in the worst case, nationalism to the point of violence. However sports can also be used as a mechanism for mending national relationships, through sports diplomacy, which can also be seen through the lens of the World Cup, specifically the match between Iran and the United States at the 1998 World Cup symbolized a turn toward more positivity in the relationship between the two countries. Thus while sports, especially soccer, can represent heightened nationalism, it can also be a tool for diplomacy.

    Like

  20. It is astonishing to think about how many men and women around the world dedicate their entire lives to a sport. They travel hundreds of miles and invest their life savings for a victorious win that not only is an accomplishment for the team playing, but the country they represent. The World Cup is not just a football game. There is so much emotion and beauty behind it, as people proudly represent and support their nation. The World Cup does not only involve and affect the players and coaches. It’s everyone around the world, even the ones that are just watching it from their TV. There are groans and cheers coming from homes everywhere, not just the main stadium. Teams in major sports, such as football, extend to their supporters from across the globe. The players are not the only ones investing so much of themselves into these games. Their fans are too. Events such as these create a sense of unity and allow people to forget about their differences, for at least a day, and come together to share a special moment. This could apply to any game that is being played throughout the elimination process. In every tournament, each win is so meaningful because it brings the team one step closer to their main goal.

    Like

  21. I thought it was very interesting how Professor Lal believed that football is being democratized. The victory of the Japanese and Saudis against once powerful European nations demonstrates the decline of European dominance. I think this illustrates how many countries are deeply invested in the World Cup because it is unpredictable, breaking the traditional power balance between imperialist Europe and its colonies. As mentioned in the blog post, the World Cup was moved to November-December, which was inconvenient timing for the Europeans. Furthermore, Europe plays into the scandals of the World Cup, while they exist unaccounted for their past actions. I think that eventually Europe’s imperialist past will catch up to it and will soon have to learn how to bow to the demands of other countries.

    I liked how Professor Lal contrasted the stoic officialism of the Olympics with the free spirit of the World Cup. In my opinion, the Olympics is much more politicized than the World Cup and has become a competition to show off power. Many countries utilize the Olympics as a way to increase nationalism and patriotism. The World Cup is interesting to watch because it is full of surprises, with the Olympics it is often easy to predict the victors because countries, such as China’s Communist Party, pour so much money and time into athletes. Perhaps this is because the Olympics occur much more often or involve more countries, but many countries do not treat the World Cup with the same ferocity.

    Like

Leave a comment